Griffin Paper Corporation - Page 21

                                       - 21 -                                         
          interest rate as a fact without persuasive evidence.  Although              
          the Stockholders' Agreement also allowed Griffin to collect                 
          5 percent of LRFP's retained earnings, in the case of profitable            
          years, we find this fact unavailing seeing that Griffin                     
          anticipated that retained earnings would be negative throughout             
          the relevant years.                                                         
               It also is relevant that Griffin at all times considered               
          itself to be the owner of 5 percent of the common stock and 32.8            
          percent of the preferred stock.  GNN recognized consistently that           
          it owned 95 percent of the voting common stock on its tax returns           
          and in its financial statements, and GNN never told Griffin that            
          it considered that it had purchased 100 percent of the voting               
          common stock and 100 percent of the preferred on December 31,               
          1981.  Indeed, it was not until 1987, 5 years after the                     
          agreements were executed, that LRFP first made an entry on its              
          books indicating a 1981 purchase of Griffin's stock.                        
               This case is similar to that of Penn-Dixie Steel Corp. v.              
          Commissioner, 69 T.C. 837 (1978).5  In Penn-Dixie, the Court held           
          that reciprocal put and call options did not constitute a sale              


               4(...continued)                                                        
          of years until payment (7.5).                                               
               5 GNN is mistaken in relying on Kwiat v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 1992-433, to support its contention that the benefits and             
          burdens of ownership passed in 1981.  In that case, the                     
          "pertinent inquiry" was "whether the purported lessor maintained            
          the risk of economic depreciation and benefit of appreciation at            
          the end of the lease term."  Id.  That is not the case here.                




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011