Robert E. and Carloyn S. Holmes - Page 44

                                       - 44 -                                         

             keeping was generally unbusinesslike, careless, and sloppy.              
                  Petitioners also failed to present any substantive                  
             evidence to support their contention that they provided                  
             their accountant with complete and accurate books and                    
             records and acted reasonably and in good faith reliance on               
             his advice.  In fact, Mr. Jackson testified that he relied               
             on petitioners to correctly categorize their expenditures                
             for tax purposes.  Accordingly, we sustain respondent's                  
             imposition of the additions to tax for negligence with                   
             respect to petitioners' 1987 and 1988 returns.                           
                  In light of the foregoing,                                          

                                           Decisions will be entered                  
                                      under Rule 155.                                 






















Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  

Last modified: May 25, 2011