Lucky Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          respondent failed to alert the Court to the existence of                    
          multiemployer plan private rulings becomes wholly irrelevant.               
               The documents submitted with petitioner's Motion and                   
          Judicial Notice Motions themselves belie petitioner's argument              
          that the result reached in our Opinion is at odds with                      
          respondent's long-standing administrative practice.  This is                
          amply illustrated by the following quotations:                              
                    [1.]  The rules contained in Rev. Rul. 76-28 regarding            
               the application of Code section 404(a)(6) are related only             
               to the timing of contributions for deduction purposes.                 
               * * *  Corporation M is entitled to claim a deduction for              
               such [1979] contribution to the extent the deduction does              
               not exceed the maximum deductible contribution for 1978.               
               [Priv. Ltr. Rul. 7945115, (Aug. 8, 1979); emphasis added.]             
                    [2.]  You state that Corporation M makes contributions            
               within the deduction limits imposed by section 404(a)(1) and           
               404(a)(7) of the Code * * *.  We conclude * * * that * * *             
               Corporation M may deduct for 1979 and later taxable years              
               under section 404(a)(1) and section 404(a)(6) of the Code              
               contributions not in excess of the limits of section                   
               404(a)(1) and section 404(a)(7) * * *.  [Priv. Ltr. Rul.               
               8010123 (Dec. 17, 1979); emphasis added.]                              
                    [3.]  While the deductions also must come within the              
               limitations of I.R.C. section 404(a), it is clear that those           
               limits were not exceeded by the taxpayer.  [Submission                 
               of a law firm in support of a ruling request; emphasis                 
               added.]                                                                
                    [4.]  This ruling does not consider the actual amounts            
               deductible for the 1977 taxable year.  Undated Technical               
               Advice Memorandum ruling involving years 1977-1978.                    
                    [5.]  The total amount that may be deducted, however,             
               is limited by the dollar amount determined under                       
               section 404(a)(1)(A) of the Code.  [Tech. Adv. Mem. 8714008            
               (Dec. 17, 1986).]                                                      
                    [6.]  In addition, the principles of Rev. Rul. 76-28,             
               regarding the application of section 404(a)(6), are related            
               only to the timing of contributions for deduction purposes             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011