- 8 - contributions, a taxpayer (petitioner included) may not arbitrarily expand its own deduction limitation for any taxable year by the simple expedient of deducting actual contributions that are inconsistent with its anticipated contributions. Lucky Stores, Inc., & Subs. v. Commissioner, 107 T.C. at 14. If any one employer-contributor to a multiemployer plan could expand its deduction limitation by this method, all could do so, a result not intended by section 413(b)(7). Nowhere in any of its moving papers does petitioner attempt to address this point. Petitioner cites Airborne Freight Corp. v. United States, 76 AFTR 2d 95-7497, 96-1 USTC par. 50,004 (W.D. Wash. 1995), as being the only other decision to consider the issue herein. Airborne Freight Corp., however, is factually distinguishable from the instant case. Our Opinion took into account testimony by the plan administrator that she customarily determined the minimum funding standards on an annual basis with reference to hours worked by covered employees before the year closed. This testimony was probative that the payments in question, insofar as they were based on wages earned after the year's end, were not treated in the same manner that the CBA plans would treat a payment actually received on the last day of the taxable year. See Lucky Stores, Inc., & Subs. v. Commissioner, 107 T.C. at 13- 15; cf. Rev. Rul. 76-28, 1976-1 C.B. 106. The order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Airborne FreightPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011