Lucky Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          contributions, a taxpayer (petitioner included) may not                     
          arbitrarily expand its own deduction limitation for any taxable             
          year by the simple expedient of deducting actual contributions              
          that are inconsistent with its anticipated contributions.  Lucky            
          Stores, Inc., & Subs. v. Commissioner, 107 T.C. at 14.  If any              
          one employer-contributor to a multiemployer plan could expand its           
          deduction limitation by this method, all could do so, a result              
          not intended by section 413(b)(7).  Nowhere in any of its moving            
          papers does petitioner attempt to address this point.                       
               Petitioner cites Airborne Freight Corp. v. United States, 76           
          AFTR 2d 95-7497, 96-1 USTC par. 50,004 (W.D. Wash. 1995), as                
          being the only other decision to consider the issue herein.                 
          Airborne Freight Corp., however, is factually distinguishable               
          from the instant case.  Our Opinion took into account testimony             
          by the plan administrator that she customarily determined the               
          minimum funding standards on an annual basis with reference to              
          hours worked by covered employees before the year closed.  This             
          testimony was probative that the payments in question, insofar as           
          they were based on wages earned after the year's end, were not              
          treated in the same manner that the CBA plans would treat a                 
          payment actually received on the last day of the taxable year.              
          See Lucky Stores, Inc., & Subs. v. Commissioner, 107 T.C. at 13-            
          15; cf. Rev. Rul. 76-28, 1976-1 C.B. 106.  The order granting               
          plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Airborne Freight                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011