James B. and Joan E. Murtaugh - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         


          Year   Return Date Tax            Withholding Overpayment                   
          1987   5/11/95      $5,515        $7,208       $1,693                       
          1988   5/13/95      5,366         10,328       4,952                        
          1990 1/15/96        5,564         6,919        1,355                        
          1990   2/26/96      6,709         6,919        210                          
          1990   3/15/96      5,942         6,919        977                          
          1991   5/15/95      2,321         3,039        718                          
          1992   5/16/95      0             2,563        2,563                        


          The parties agree that if respondent prevails on the issues as              
          stated below, the revised deficiencies and additions to tax will            
          be as follows:                                                              

                                             Addition to    Addition                  
                 Statutory   Deficiency/     Tax            to Tax                    
          Year   Deficiency  (Overpayment)   Sec. 6651(a)   Sec. 6654                 
          1987   $ 5,515     ($1,693)        $  0           $ 0                       
          1988   5,366       (4,952)         0                                        
          1990   12,328      5,409           1,352          305                       
          1991   2,321       (718)           0              0                         
          1992   4,114       1,551           388            55                        

          Petitioners concede that the overpayments are barred by section             
          6511(b)(2)(B).                                                              
               We must decide the following issues:                                   
               (1) Whether petitioners are required to include, as ordinary           
          income, the entire distribution of $25,313.22 received by James             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011