Norwest Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 12

                                        -12-                                          
          facilities in South Dakota and Nebraska, including the Douglas              
          Street building. On February 9, 1987, petitioner received                   
          notification that the January testing indicated that the sprayed-on         
          fireproofing contained 8 to 10 percent chrysotile asbestos and the          
          ceiling tiles on the parking level contained 26-percent chrysotile          
          asbestos.  This confirmed the St. Paul results.                             
               At the request of Marsh & McLennan, Clayton conducted                  
          extensive additional testing for airborne asbestos-fiber                    
          concentrations in the Douglas Street building.  On February 25,             
          1987, Clayton collected air samples from the building.  On April            
          14, 1987, it issued the results of its survey, which indicated that         
          the airborne asbestos fiber concentrations present during normal            
          occupancy of the Douglas Street building ranged from 0.0002 to              
          0.006 fiber per cubic centimeter of air. The highest level of               
          airborne fiber concentration at the Douglas Street building (0.006          
          fiber per cubic centimeter of air) did not exceed either the EPA or         
          OSHA guidelines.  There was, however, the expectation that the              
          airborne asbestos-fiber concentrations would continue to increase.          
          Moreover, the asbestos-containing fireproofing at the Douglas               
          Street Building had characteristics that the EPA had identified as          
          warranting  removal  of  the  material,  such  as  evidence  of             
          delamination, presence of debris, proximity to an air plenum, and           
          necessity of access for maintenance.                                        
               After considering the circumstances, petitioner decided to             
          remove the asbestos-containing materials from the Douglas Street            




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011