the year in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's 1991 Federal income tax in the amount of $7,795, together with an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) of $1,356. We must decide: (1) Whether petitioner improperly reported income and deductions on two Schedules C and on a Schedule E attached to her 1991 Federal income tax return; (2) whether petitioner is subject to additional self-employment tax; (3) whether petitioner is entitled to a child care credit; and (4) whether petitioner is liable for an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a). Some of the facts have been stipulated and they are so found. Petitioner resided in Solana Beach, California, when her petition was filed. For clarity and convenience, our findings of fact and opinion have been combined. During 1991, petitioner was married but separated from her husband. During that year, petitioner was a paralegal licensed to practice in California. She operated two paralegal businesses. On her 1991 Federal income tax return, petitioner reported income and expenses of her two paralegal business on two Schedules C, "Julie Pusateri-Paralegal" (Schedule C-1), and "Legal Assistance Center" (Schedule C-2). The parties have used the Schedule C-1 and Schedule C-2 terminology and so shall we.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011