- 7 - to hide this by specious deductions on her Schedule C-1. On this record, we are satisfied that petitioner reported all of her income, subject to correction for the $258 mistake in her favor. Accordingly, we sustain petitioner on this issue. Petitioner's self-employment tax was increased by respondent. A taxpayer is liable for self-employment tax on net earnings pursuant to section 1401. Net earnings are defined as "the gross income derived by an individual from any trade or business carried on by such individual," less the allowable deductions pertaining to such trade or business. Sec. 1402(a). It is not disputed that petitioner is self-employed in both her businesses. Accordingly, petitioner is liable for self- employment taxes to the extent that petitioner has net earnings under our findings. The deduction of one-half of the self- employment tax will be a computational adjustment. Sec. 164(f). The parties stipulated that the gross receipts in the Union Bank account were $29,056, which was $258 less than the gross receipts of $29,314 reported on the Schedule C-1. We conclude that the gross receipts for the Schedule C-1 business were $29,056. When we deduct the expenses stipulated as substantiated by petitioner of $6,274, petitioner had net profit of $22,782 for her Schedule C-1 paralegal business. This is in sharp contrast to the net profit of $12,201 petitioner reported on the original Schedule C-1.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011