John Sann and Marianne Sann, et al. - Page 82

                                       - 82 -                                         
          requests approximately 4 months after the trials of their cases.            
          We are reluctant to find that respondent abused discretion in               
          these cases when respondent was not timely requested to exercise            
          it and there is no direct evidence of any abuse of administrative           
          discretion.  Haught v. Commissioner, supra; cf. Wynn v.                     
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-609; Klieger v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 1992-734.                                                             
               However, we do not decide this issue solely on petitioners'            
          failure timely to request waivers but instead, we have considered           
          the issue on its merits.  Petitioners urge that they relied on              
          the offering materials and Maxfield in deciding on the valuation            
          claimed on their tax returns.  Petitioners contend that such                
          reliance was reasonable and, therefore, that respondent should              
          have waived the section 6659 additions to tax.  However, as we              
          explained above in finding petitioners liable for the negligence            
          additions to tax, petitioners' purported reliance on the offering           
          materials and on Maxfield, with respect to matters outside his              
          area of expertise, was not reasonable.                                      
               To varying degrees, each of petitioners reviewed at least              
          one of the offering memoranda for the Partnerships, each of which           
          contained numerous warnings and caveats, including the likelihood           
          that the value placed on the recyclers would be challenged by the           
          IRS as being in excess of fair market value.  Petitioners could             
          not have failed to learn from either the offering materials or              
          Maxfield that the purported value of the Sentinel EPE recycler              




Page:  Previous  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011