Sprint Corporation and Subsidiaries, f.k.a. United Telecommunications, Inc. - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
          all of the software loads used in all of the digital switches in            
          issue and that those software loads constitute tangible personal            
          property for purposes of the ITC and the ACRS.2  Therefore,                 
          petitioner is entitled to the claimed investment tax credits and            
          accelerated depreciation deductions.                                        
          II. The Drop and Block Issue                                                
               A.   Introduction                                                      
               The drop and block portion of petitioner's telephone network           
          consists of the wire running from petitioner's transmission                 
          network to a station protector located on the outside of a                  
          customer's premises.  We must determine the depreciation class of           
          the drop and block for purposes of the ACRS.                                

          2    In accordance with Norwest Corp. & Subs. v. Commissioner,              
          108 T.C. ___ (1997), we hold today that the software loads in               
          issue constitute tangible personal property for purposes of the             
          investment tax credit (ITC) and tangible property for purposes of           
          the accelerated cost recovery system (ACRS).  Although respondent           
          does not assert that there exists a distinction in the meaning of           
          the term “tangible” as it is used in the term “tangible personal            
          property” for purposes of the ITC and the term “tangible                    
          property” for purposes of the ACRS, we believe that our reliance            
          on the legislative history of the ITC in Norwest requires at                
          least a brief discussion of that issue.                                     
               As a preliminary matter, sec. 168 and the regulations                  
          thereunder do not define the term “tangible property” for                   
          purposes of the ACRS.  Sec. 168, which implements the ACRS, was             
          enacted by the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA), Pub. L.            
          97-34, sec. 201, 95 Stat. 203.  The relevant committee reports              
          accompanying the enactment of ERTA indicate that Congress, in               
          substantial part, considered the ITC and the ACRS to be in pari             
          materia.  See H. Rept. 97-201, at 73-74 (1981); S. Rept. 97-144,            
          at 47 (1981), 1981-2 C.B. 412, 425; H. Conf. Rept. 97-215, at               
          206, 213 (1981), 1981-2 C.B. 481, 487, 490.  This Court will not            
          create a distinction unintended by Congress, and, thus, we                  
          conclude that the software loads in issue constitute tangible               
          property for purposes of the ACRS.                                          




Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011