Sprint Corporation and Subsidiaries, f.k.a. United Telecommunications, Inc. - Page 33

                                       - 33 -                                         
          be applicable with respect to any property as of January 1,                 
          1981”.  Sec. 168(g)(2) (emphasis added).  We agree with                     
          petitioner; the language is not ambiguous, and accordingly we               
          need not peer into the legislative history.  Nevertheless, such             
          an inquiry would support our analysis.  The intent of the ACRS              
          was to eliminate disagreement between taxpayers and the                     
          Commissioner and to stimulate economic activity.  One essential             
          theme of the ACRS was predictable depreciation periods; that was            
          accomplished by freezing in time the property classifications as            
          they were on January 1, 1981.  Until further amendment by                   
          Congress, there were to be no changes.                                      
               C.   Conclusion                                                        
               Drop and block, as of January 1, 1981, was included in FCC             
          account No. 232.  That account had an asset guideline period of             
          10 years, making it 5-year property under section 168(c)(2)(B).             
          We conclude that drop and block placed in service in the years in           
          question is 5-year property for purposes of the ACRS.                       

                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                              under Rule 155.                         

               Reviewed by the Court.                                                 
               SWIFT, PARR, WELLS, RUWE, WHALEN, BEGHE, FOLEY, VASQUEZ, and           
          GALE, JJ., agree with this majority opinion.                                
               CHIECHI, J., did not participate in the consideration of               
          this opinion.                                                               
               COLVIN, J., dissents.                                                  




Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011