Saffet and Ana Uslu - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

          Following settlement of various issues by the parties, the                  
          sole issue for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to a            
          deduction for qualified residence interest under section 163(a).2           
          Some of the facts were stipulated, and those facts, with the                
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by               
          reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioners'                
          legal residence was Covina, California.                                     
               Saffet Uslu (petitioner husband) immigrated to the United              
          States from Turkey and, during the early 1980's, studied for a              
          graduate degree in petroleum engineering at the University of               
          Southern California (USC).  In 1983, while petitioner husband was           
          attending graduate school, petitioner husband's brother, Haluk              
          Uslu (Haluk), immigrated to the United States from Turkey and               
          lived with petitioner husband.  As an immigrant, Haluk was unable           

          2                                                                           
               The parties agreed to the following: (1) Petitioners are               
          entitled to an automobile expense deduction of $2,559 on the                
          Schedule C of petitioner husband; (2) petitioners are not                   
          entitled to a repair expense deduction of $908 claimed on the               
          Schedule C of petitioner husband; (3) petitioners are not                   
          entitled to deduct $1,550 of the $2,509 meals and entertainment             
          expense deduction claimed on the Schedule C of petitioner                   
          husband; (4) petitioners are not entitled to deduct $1,802 of the           
          $5,267 "other expenses" claimed on the Schedule C of petitioner             
          husband; (5) petitioners are not entitled to deduct "other                  
          expenses" of $1,254 claimed on the Schedule C of petitioner wife;           
          and (6) petitioners are entitled to an additional self-employment           
          tax deduction of $120 due to a change in net earnings from self-            
          employment resulting from the aforementioned adjustments.  The              
          remaining adjustments to petitioners' child and dependent care              
          credit and to petitioners' itemized deductions for charitable               
          contributions and unreimbursed employee business expenses are               
          computational and will be resolved by the Court's holding on the            
          mortgage interest deduction issue.                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011