Saffet and Ana Uslu - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          property from their own income.  The real property taxes and                
          insurance on the Alisal property were paid from an escrow account           
          at Southern California Federal that was funded with a portion of            
          petitioners' mortgage payments.  Furthermore, petitioners and               
          their children have been the sole occupants of the Alisal                   
          property since the time of its purchase in 1990.                            
               Haluk and Aysun have made no payments, either directly or              
          indirectly, in connection with the Alisal property for the                  
          mortgage, repairs, maintenance, or otherwise.  They have not                
          acted in such a manner that would be consistent with an ownership           
          interest in the Alisal property.  Haluk and Aysun have made no              
          claim of ownership interest in the Alisal property since the time           
          of its purchase.  Furthermore, Haluk testified at trial that the            
          sole reason he and Aysun procured legal title to the Alisal                 
          property and obtained a mortgage loan secured by such property              
          was to assist petitioners in obtaining the Alisal property for              
          petitioners' residence.  Additionally, during 1995, Haluk and               
          Aysun executed a quitclaim deed transferring legal title to the             
          Alisal property to petitioners.3  This quitclaim deed, however,             
          was not recorded.  At trial, Haluk testified unequivocally that,            
          even though he and Aysun recognized their liability on the                  

          3                                                                           
               The face of this quitclaim deed stated that it was "Ratified           
          4/9/90", which the Court surmises was intended to make the                  
          quitclaim deed retroactive to the date of the initial purchase of           
          the property.                                                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011