- 3 - in and loans to the S corporations and the extent, if any, to which petitioner recognized income upon the acquisition by one of these corporations of assets from the other. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated, and are so found. The stipulations of fact and attached exhibits are incorporated by this reference. At the time the petition was filed, petitioners resided in Columbia, South Carolina. In 1987 petitioner founded Williams Investigative & Security Services, Inc. (WIS). Petitioner was the operator and sole shareholder of WIS throughout its existence. WIS was primarily engaged in the business of insurance investigations; it also provided security services. Throughout 1990 WIS was in a dispute with a client over a major security services contract. The client unilaterally cut back the amount of services required, then terminated the contract prematurely and disavowed representations it had made to WIS concerning future work engagements. At the end of the year, WIS filed suit for fraud, breach of contract and promissory estoppel, seeking recovery of compensatory and punitive damages arising from the loss of the contract and the valuable engagements. See Kemira, Inc. v. Williams Investigative & Sec. Serv., Inc., 450 S.E.2d 427 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). As WIS’s financial situation deteriorated, it was compelled to borrow. Third-party loans were not sufficient, however, toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011