Terry Duane Beall and Joyce Engel Beall - Page 22

                                       - 22 -                                         

               Homeowners' Exemption, Voter Registrations, and Driver's               
          Licenses:  Respondent points out the following facts.  First, no            
          homeowners' exemption was filed regarding 20 The Point.  Second,            
          petitioners’ voter registration renewals, dated November 29,                
          1989, did not reflect 20 The Point as their address.  Instead,              
          the renewals changed petitioners' address from Mary Street to 15            
          Sandpiper.  Third, petitioners did not report 20 The Point to the           
          California Department of Motor Vehicles.                                    
               In regard to the homeowners' exemption, petitioners acquired           
          20 The Point on August 31, 1988, but at that time, they already             
          had filed and obtained a homeowners' exemption for 1988 on Mary             
          Street.  Under California law, the eligibility for homeowners'              
          exemption is determined as of the "lien date", which is March 1             
          of each year.  Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code sec. 2192 (1987).                      
          Affidavits  for a homeowners' exemption are required to be filed            
          after the claimant becomes eligible but no later than April 15.             
          Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code sec. 255(b)(1987).  By the following year             
          (1989), petitioners had sold 20 The Point (March 9, 1988) and               
          acquired 15 Sandpiper (November 21, 1988).  As a result,                    
          petitioners received a homeowners' exemption for 1989 on 15                 
          Sandpiper, having owned the property as of the lien date.  See              
          Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code sec. 253.5 (1987).  Therefore, the fact               
          that petitioners did not apply for a homeowners' exemption on 20            
          The Point is of little significance, given that their actions               





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011