Cerand & Company, Inc. - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

          section 166.1  The remainder of respondent’s determination, the             
          1992 net operating loss (NOL) carryforward and a charitable gift            
          deduction, is purely computational adjustments caused by the                
          reduction of petitioner’s ordinary loss deduction and the                   
          corresponding increase in income.                                           
               Respondent contends that the extension of credit to                    
          corporations wholly owned by petitioner’s sole shareholder                  
          constituted equity investments in those companies.  As such,                
          respondent argues that the corporations’ subsequent failures                
          resulted in capital rather than ordinary losses for petitioner.             
          Petitioner counters that the lines of credit were valid debt                
          incurred by the corporations, and the corporations’ inability to            
          repay the debt created an ordinary loss for petitioner under                
          section 166.                                                                
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               The stipulation of facts and the exhibits attached thereto             
          are incorporated herein by this reference.                                  
               Petitioner Cerand & Company, Inc., offers consulting                   
          services concerning the operation of airport parking lots.                  
          Petitioner was located in Washington, D.C., at the time the                 
          petition in this case was filed.  Petitioner’s president is                 


               1  Unless otherwise stated, all section references are to              
          the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in                
          issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of                
          Practice and Procedure.                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011