Jane Crocker, F.K.A. Jane C. Jacobs, et al. - Page 75

                                       - 65 -                                         
               Carneghi next subtracted landlord expenses from the annual             
          gross potential income.  Because the market rents were estimated            
          on a triple net basis (whereby the tenant is responsible for all            
          expenses including taxes, insurance, maintenance, utilities, and            
          janitorial), the only expenses Carneghi determined to be incurred           
          by the landlord were management and structural reserves.  He                
          projected these expenses at 3 percent and 1 percent of effective            
          gross income, respectively.                                                 
               After subtracting the estimated expenses, Carneghi arrived             
          at an estimate of net operating income for the property.  To this           
          figure he applied a capitalization rate of 7.5 percent.  Carneghi           
          chose this capitalization rate based on his comparable office               
          building sales, which encompassed a range of capitalization rates           
          of 6.5 percent to 10.5 percent.  Carneghi concluded that, after             
          consideration of the quality of the property, its lack of                   
          parking, the fact that the retail/office space is small and is              
          part of a larger building, a capitalization rate of 8.0 percent             
          was appropriate.  However, in light of the below-market Jacobs              
          lease, which created a low-risk situation for the building owner,           
          a lower capitalization rate of 7.5 percent was warranted.                   
               Carneghi arrived at a value of $1,130,000 (rounded) for the            
          retail/office space under the income capitalization approach,               
          calculated as follows:                                                      








Page:  Previous  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011