- 67 -                                         
          Carneghi considered the comparable sales approach, which was                
          based on contemporaneous sales of “similar old theater buildings”           
          like the Redwood City Fox, to be more reliable.  Consequently,              
          Carneghi accorded the value indicated by the comparable sales               
          approach all the weight and accorded no weight to the value                 
          indicated by the replacement cost approach.  Carneghi thus valued           
          the theater portion of the Redwood City Fox at $2,000,000.                  
                         b.  Retail/Office                                            
               For the retail/office component of the Redwood City Fox,               
          Carneghi arrived at the following values under the following                
          appraisal methods:                                                          
               Replacement Cost Approach               $1,460,000                     
               Comparable Sales Approach               $1,470,000                     
               Income Approach-Direct Capitalization   $1,130,000                     
          With respect to the replacement cost approach, Carneghi again               
          stated that valuation under this method “is not considered a good           
          indicator in valuation of a renovated older building with                   
          specialized improvements.”  Carneghi found that valuation under             
          the comparable sales approach was a “good indicator” of value,              
          but that the approach did not “consider” the below-market Jacobs            
          lease.  With respect to the income capitalization approach, which           
          utilized both the market rent estimate and the rent generated by            
          the Jacobs lease, Carneghi found that the approach                          
               is considered a good indicator for the subject property                
               which is impacted by a below market lease.  However,                   
               this approach may be unduly impacted by the below                      
               market rent although the upside income potential was                   
               accounted for in the selection of the capitalization                   
               rate.                                                                  
Page:  Previous   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011