- 40 -
Government knew he would be filing for bankruptcy. However,
during his deposition on October 17, 1996, in the case of
Thompson v. United States, 95-C-1112-B (N.D. Okla.), Winer
testified that the Government did not link the outcome of his
personal tax case to any of the Plastics Recycling partnership
cases.
K. The Davenport Partnership Litigation
Both Winer and Davenport were represented during the
Davenport TEFRA partnership litigation by Gordon at all times
relevant hereto, and by Hack until her withdrawal in April 1991.
Respondent was represented during the Davenport partnership
litigation in this case by District Counsel Attorneys Mary P.
Hamilton, Paul V. Colleran, and Kirk S. Chaberski and by
Assistant District Counsel William T. Hayes.
After the issuance of the FPAA's in the Hamilton case, Winer
wrote a memorandum to the partners of Hamilton, Davenport and
Dickinson Recycling Associates, including Karras, on May 30,
1989. In his memorandum, Winer enclosed a copy of a Notice of
Filing of Petition for Hamilton Recycling Associates and stated:
Please be advised that we will do the same for
Dickinson, Davenport, and any other partnerships that
require this filing. We sincerely hope that you will
continue to support our Legal Defense Fund so that we
may continue to retain counsel to represent the
partnership in order to obtain a favorable disposition
of this matter.
Page: Previous 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011