- 142 - payments should have been made for years prior to 1987 for excess shipments (imbalance) and for transfer items handled by DHL for DHLI. As to the 1987 year and later, respondent contends that the 2-percent markup was not at arm’s length and was inadequate to compensate DHL or DHLI. Petitioners again argue that the arrangement between DHL and DHLI was commercially reasonable and within a range that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations between unrelated parties. Petitioners argue that the approach used was comparable to the express mail arrangements between the U.S. Postal Service and other national postal administrations during the 1970’s or about the same time as the reciprocity began between DHL and DHLI. Petitioners also cited one such arrangement between unrelated entities. Respondent argues from a stronger position because of the 1987 implementation of a cost-plus arrangement for the excess or imbalance. Petitioners try to explain this away by contending that the circumstances extant at that time should not determine what was commercially reasonable in earlier periods. Petitioners also point out that DHL did not maintain detailed cost information before 1987. The parties proffered expertise to the Court on these matters. Petitioners offered an economist who analyzed the imbalance and transfer fees between DHL and DHLI and an economist specializing in the economics of regulated industries, includingPage: Previous 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011