DHL Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 59

                                        - 144 -                                       
          As time progressed, the convention was modified for inflation and           
          to take into account varying and more specific information and              
          fees.                                                                       
               Respondent agrees with the postal system analogy and does              
          not question DHL and DHLI’s methodology, but contends that the              
          postal community recognized that its basic assumption was no                
          longer valid in 1969, whereas petitioners essentially ignored the           
          imbalance until they were forced to change their imbalance or               
          transfer practices.  Respondent contends that DHL and DHLI                  
          changed their practices in 1987 only after those practices were             
          brought into question by a regulatory agency and/or an                      
          administrative law judge.                                                   
               We agree with respondent on this point--it was reasonable              
          for petitioners to fashion their imbalance and transfer approach            
          after that used in the postal community, but that does not                  
          explain why it was appropriate to wait until 1987 to address the            
          imbalance.  In addition, we cannot accept petitioners’ argument             
          that it would have been difficult to quantify any imbalance or              
          transfers because of the manner in which their records were kept.           
          There is no doubt that petitioners would have found some                    
          reasonable way (as respondent’s expert did) to determine the                
          imbalance or transfer costs if they were dealing with an                    
          unrelated third party with whom a reciprocal agreement existed.             
          Accordingly, we proceed to decide the arm’s-length percentage               
          compensation that would have been charged by independent parties.           




Page:  Previous  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011