- 27 - petitioner and the RIC realistically expect the relationship to continue indefinitely and, thus, the relationship has an expected life of more than 1 year. Petitioner viewed the launching of a new RIC as a long-term proposition and generally anticipated that it could take several years for a new RIC to become successful.11 Mr. Roger Servison, executive vice president in charge of new business development and corporate policy for Fidelity Investments testified at trial regarding when a RIC would be considered successful, stating: 11Mr. Edward C. Johnson, III, the chief executive officer of petitioner, testified: A. * * * sometimes we bring out new funds, and they can--the germination period can be an incredible period of time. I mean I think in terms--we started talking about Magellan Fund a little earlier--I think in terms of Magellan Fund, I think we first brought it out in 1962, '63. Then, there were some taxes put on foreign investment, so that slowed the fund up. And then we went through the malaise of the early seventies. I think by--by 1980, the fund had hardly grown one single bit, and needless to say, it cost us a lot of money. We felt an obligation to the shareholders primarily who were in the fund. I think we also had a faith that at some point in time, that other investors would come along and then something that had not produced an interest level by the shareholders in the seventies--and the fund was available to investors in the seventies--we had a faith that sometime they--there would be an interest, but it took--with that fund, it really took probably 20 years before it what you might say made any particular contribution to overhead.Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011