Thomas L. Freytag and Sharon N. Freytag - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          petitioner filed a motion for summary judgment asking that this             
          case "be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction".                
          Consistent with the order of the bankruptcy court, Mr. Freytag              
          and respondent filed a stipulation of settled issues in which it            
          is agreed that there is no deficiency for 1978; there are no                
          additions to tax for the years 1978, 1981, and 1982; and there              
          are deficiencies in the amounts of $53,598 and $36,901 for the              
          years 1981 and 1982, respectively.                                          
          Summary Judgment                                                            
               Rule 121 provides that either party may move for summary               
          judgment on all or any part of the legal issues in controversy              
          where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and a               
          decision may be entered as a matter of law.  As we understand               
          Mrs. Freytag's position, she does not seek an entry of a                    
          decision, but rather a dismissal of the case for lack of                    
          jurisdiction with respect to her.  Summary judgment, therefore,             
          would not be an appropriate vehicle to obtain the relief that she           
          seeks.  Nonetheless, as we shall see, there is an aspect of                 
          petitioner's argument that is appropriate for summary judgment              
          resolution.  In these circumstances, initially for discussion               
          purposes, we treat petitioner's motion as a motion to dismiss for           
          lack of jurisdiction, which we deny, and then proceed with an               
          analysis for the proper disposition of this case.                           
          Jurisdiction of the Tax Court                                               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011