Maude G. Furman, Donor, Deceased, and Estate of Maude G. Furman, Deceased, Robert G. Furman, Executor - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         
          amount, if any, of the excess of the value of the shares of                 
          common stock that decedents surrendered in the Recapitalization             
          of August 24, 1981, over the value of the shares of preferred               
          stock that they received in the exchange.  The amount of any such           
          excess, by augmenting the value of Robert's common stock in FIC,            
          would be a taxable gift from decedents to Robert.  See Estate of            
          Trenchard v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-121 supplemented by              
          T.C. Memo. 1995-232; sec. 25.2511-1(h)(1), Gift Tax Regs.                   
               Valuation is a question of fact, and the trier of fact must            
          weigh all relevant evidence to draw the appropriate inferences.             
          Commissioner v. Scottish Am. Inv. Co., 323 U.S. 119, 123-125                
          (1944); Helvering v. National Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 282, 294-295            
          (1938); Anderson v. Commissioner, 250 F.2d 242, 249 (5th Cir.               
          1957), affg. in part and remanding in part T.C. Memo. 1956-178;             
          Estate of Newhouse v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 193, 217 (1990);                
          Skripak v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 285, 320 (1985).                           
               Fair market value is defined for Federal estate and gift tax           
          purposes as the price that a willing buyer would pay a willing              
          seller, both having reasonable knowledge of all the relevant                
          facts and neither being under compulsion to buy or to sell.                 
          United States v. Cartwright, 411 U.S. 546, 551 (1973) (citing               
          sec. 20.2031-1(b), Estate Tax Regs.); see also Snyder v.                    
          Commissioner, 93 T.C. 529, 539 (1989); Estate of Hall v.                    
          Commissioner, 92 T.C. 312, 335 (1989).  The willing buyer and the           
          willing seller are hypothetical persons, rather than specific               




Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011