Maude G. Furman, Donor, Deceased, and Estate of Maude G. Furman, Deceased, Robert G. Furman, Executor - Page 35

                                       - 35 -                                         
          commonly used valuation guideline that should be applied in this            
          case.  IPC determined that high interest rates, a sluggish                  
          economy, and the high returns required by investors in small                
          companies were factors that would depress the value of FIC stock,           
          leading to a multiple in the order of 4.0 to 4.5, while the                 
          modestly successful sales growth of FIC between 1979 and 1981               
          suggested a multiple of 5.0 to 5.5.  IPC concluded that FIC                 
          should be valued using an EBITDA multiple of 5.0 for both 1980              
          and 1981.                                                                   
               After determining total enterprise value, IPC made various             
          adjustments, such as subtracting the value of outstanding debt,             
          to determine total equity value, which was then converted to                
          equity value per share.  Equity value per share was determined to           
          be $20,842 in February 1980 and $26,245 in August 1981.  After              
          applying a 30-percent minority discount, a 35-percent                       
          marketability discount, and a 10-percent key-person discount, or            
          a total of 59.05 percent in discounts, IPC determined a fair                
          market value per share of $8,535 in February 1980 and $10,747 in            
          August 1981; following these conclusions would result in an                 
          overstatement of $10,806 for Royal and Maude's 1980 taxable                 
          gifts, and zero taxable gifts for their transfers in 1981.                  
               We found Messrs. Burns and Oliver to be qualified,                     
          experienced, and credible expert witnesses.  We agree with them             
          that valuing FIC using the income method would not be appropriate           
          inasmuch as the income method produces a value less than book               




Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011