Golden Gate Litho - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

          all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.  After concessions1 by the parties, the issues to be             
          decided are:                                                                
               (1)  Whether petitioner is required to change from the cash            
          method of accounting to the accrual method of accounting;                   
               (2)  if petitioner is required to change to the accrual                
          method of accounting, to what extent, if any, adjustments were              
          properly made under section 481; and                                        
               (3) whether petitioner is liable for the accuracy-related              
          penalty under section 6662(a).                                              
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Petitioner is a California corporation organized in 1980.              
          At the time of filing the petition in this case, petitioner's               
          principal place of business was in Oakland, California.                     
          Petitioner is owned 76 percent by its president, Clifford Asher             
          (Mr. Asher), and 24 percent by Mr. Asher's son, Donald Asher.               
               Petitioner is in the lithography or commercial printing                
          business.  The business was established by a prior owner in 1937.           
          In 1973, Mr. Asher purchased the business from the prior owner.             
          In 1980, Mr. Asher incorporated the business and changed its name           
          to Golden Gate Litho.                                                       


               1  Respondent concedes that petitioner is entitled to deduct           
          commission expenses in the amount of $21,888.  Petitioner                   
          concedes that it is not entitled to deduct a loss of $6,215 on              
          the sale of an automobile.                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011