Golden Gate Litho - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         

          gross receipts $250,378 attributable to accounts receivable at              
          the beginning of the year and included $196,916 attributable to             
          accounts receivable at the close of the year.  The amount of                
          receivables, however, was determined by compiling amounts                   
          reflected on customer account cards.                                        
               Accrual method taxpayers recognize income when "all the                
          events have occurred which fix the right to receive such income             
          and the amount thereof can be determined with reasonable                    
          accuracy."  Sec. 1.446-1(c)(1)(ii), Income Tax Regs.                        
          Generally, under the "all events" test, accrual method                      
          taxpayers recognize income when it is paid, due, or earned,                 
          whichever occurs first.  See, e.g., Schlude v. Commissioner,                
          372 U.S. 128, 133 n.6 (1963).                                               
               As discussed above, the breakdown of the work in process               
          at the end of the year included amounts that had been earned,               
          even though not billed to the client.  Those amounts were                   
          accounts receivable at the close of the taxable year.                       
          Consequently, gross receipts should have been increased by                  
          those amounts.  Similarly, any portion of the work in process               
          at the beginning of the year representing completed work that               
          had been shipped by the close of the previous tax year properly             
          was a receivable attributable to the prior taxable year.                    
          Consequently, gross receipts should have been reduced by that               
          amount.                                                                     





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011