Golden Gate Litho - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          A.   Whether Petitioner Is Required To Maintain Inventories                 
               Petitioner prints calendars, napkins, greeting cards, and              
          forms according to the specifications of its customers.                     
          Petitioner does not maintain a stock of paper or other materials            
          because each job requires paper of a different weight and                   
          finish.  Petitioner orders the types of paper and supplies                  
          needed for a job after the customer's order is placed.  Usually             
          when a job is completed, any materials left over are scraps and             
          are not used for other jobs.                                                
               Respondent asserts that petitioner's production, purchase,             
          and sale of merchandise is an income-producing factor, and                  
          therefore petitioner must account for inventories.  Petitioner              
          argues that it provides a service, and the printed items it                 
          sells to its customers and the materials it uses are not                    
          merchandise.  Petitioner argues, therefore, it is not required              
          to maintain inventories.                                                    
               Although not specifically defined in the Internal Revenue              
          Code or regulations, courts have found that the term                        
          "merchandise", as used in section 1.471-1, Income Tax Regs., is             
          defined as an item held for sale.  Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v.                 
          Commissioner, supra at 354-355; Tebarco Mechanical Corp. v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-311; Galedrige Constr., Inc. v.               
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-240; Honeywell Inc. & Subs. v.                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011