David R. Green and Carolyn B. Green - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

          amount, petitioners reported that $17,880 ($1,490 x 12) was                 
          taxable for each year.  The remaining $18,120 ($1,510 x 12) for             
          each year attributable to the amount of the payments made during            
          the year in satisfaction of the Jury Award was not reported as              
          taxable.                                                                    
               Respondent determined that the entire $36,000 in payments              
          for each year is taxable.                                                   
               Petitioners first appeared before this Court with respect to           
          taxable year 1991, in a case conducted under the "small tax case"           
          procedures authorized by section 7463 and Rules 170 through 179.            
          The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule             
          121.  The relevant issue there was whether petitioners were                 
          entitled, on the basis of section 104(a)(2), to exclude the                 
          entire $36,000 payment, or a portion thereof, that petitioner               
          received pursuant to the Settlement Agreement.  In Green v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 1995-167, we denied                      
          petitioners' motion for summary judgment and granted respondent's           
          motion for summary judgment insofar as we concluded that the                
          $18,120, attributable to the amount of the Jury Award, was                  
          includable in petitioners' income for 1991.  We further concluded           
          that a material fact remained in dispute with respect to the                
          remaining portion of the $36,000 payment, or $17,880, which                 
          petitioners initially included in income, but later contended was           
          excludable under section 104(a)(2).  We found that the record was           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011