Greenberg Brothers Partnership #12, a.k.a. Lone Wolf McQuade Associates, and Richard M. Greenberg, Tax Matters Partner - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

          property.  See N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law sec. 50 (McKinney 1988); N.Y.             
          Gen. Oblig. Law sec. 3-301(1) (McKinney 1989).4                             
               In the instant cases, the parties have stipulated that Mr.             
          Locke purchased the partnership interests in his name, and that             
          the partnerships issued all Schedules K-1 solely in Mr. Locke's             
          name.  We conclude that Mrs. Locke had neither a joint interest             
          in Mr. Locke's partnership investments, nor a separate interest             
          in the partnerships.                                                        
          Analysis Under TEFRA                                                        
               The parties agree that as of the date Mr. Locke filed a                
          voluntary petition in bankruptcy, all partnership items                     
          attributable to him were converted to nonpartnership items by               
          conjunctive operation of the bankruptcy rule and section 6231(b)            
          and (c).  As a result of that conversion, this Court in these               


               4                                                                      
                    N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law sec. 50 (McKinney 1988), provides              
          that:  "Property, real or personal, * * * owned by a married                
          woman * * * shall continue to be her sole and separate property             
          as if she were unmarried".  N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law sec. 3-301(1)              
          (McKinney 1989), provides that:  "A married woman has all the               
          rights in respect to property, real or personal, and the                    
          acquisition, use, enjoyment and disposition thereof * * * as if             
          she were unmarried."  These provisions were enacted to abrogate             
          the common-law rule entitling the husband to all rents and                  
          profits from his wife's real property and absolute rights in his            
          wife's personal property.  See Practice Commentaries to N.Y. Dom.           
          Rel. Law sec. 50 (McKinney 1988).  When construed in conjunction            
          with the equitable distribution statute, these provisions confirm           
          that property acquired by either spouse during marriage is                  
          separate property unless otherwise determined in a proceeding for           
          equitable distribution under N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law sec. 236(B)(5)              
          (McKinney 1986).  Practice Commentaries to N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law               
          sec. 50, supra.                                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011