- 15 - We have considered all the other arguments made by the parties and, to the extent not discussed above, find them to be irrelevant or without merit.8 To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order will be issued denying the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction as to Karin M. Locke and granting the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction as to Edwin A. Locke, Jr. 8 Also without merit is Mrs. Locke's argument that a failure to allocate 100 percent of the partnership interests to Mr. Locke could potentially result in double taxation. Respondent is entitled to have any tax liability arising from Mr. Locke's investments in the partnerships satisfied only once. See Dolan v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 420, 430 (1965). Full payment of a joint and several obligation by one obligor extinguishes the liability of all obligors. Kroh v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 383, 397 (1992); Dolan v. Commissioner, supra at 430.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011