Therese Hahn - Page 3

                                         -3-                                          
          expressly or impliedly repealed the effective date of section               
          2040(b)(1).  Petitioner resided in Oakland, California, at the              
          time she filed her petition.                                                
               A motion for summary judgment is appropriate "if the                   
          pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, admissions,             
          and any other acceptable materials, together with the affidavits,           
          if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material              
          fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law."               
          Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520             
          (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994).  The moving party                
          bears the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of               
          material fact, and factual inferences are viewed in the light               
          most favorable to the nonmoving party.  United States v. Diebold,           
          Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962); Preece v. Commissioner, 95 T.C.             
          594, 597 (1990).                                                            
               The opposing party cannot rest upon mere allegations or                
          denials but must set forth specific facts showing there is a                
          genuine issue for trial.  Rule 121(d).  The existence of any                
          reasonable doubt as to the facts will result in denial of the               
          motion for summary judgment.  Hoeme v. Commissioner, 63 T.C. 18,            
          20 (1974).  We set forth a summary of facts relevant to our                 
          discussion that do not appear to be in dispute; the facts are               
          stated solely for purposes of deciding the motions and are not              
          findings of fact for this case.  See Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a);                 
          Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, supra at 520.                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011