Therese Hahn - Page 18

                                        -18-                                          
          they cannot mutually coexist.  Id. at 155.  The statutory                   
          provisions here are not so irreconcilable.  "[Section] 2040(b)(1)           
          applies to a qualified joint interest created after 1976, and               
          * * * [section] 2040(b)(2) redefines a qualified joint interest             
          for estates of decedents dying after 1981."  Gallenstein v.                 
          United States, 975 F.2d at 291; see also Patten v. United States,           
          supra at 1035 ("[Section 2040(b)(1)] could easily be read to                
          apply to a qualified joint interest created after December 31,              
          1976.  For decedents dying before January 1, 1982, the old                  
          definition of qualified joint interest applies, while for                   
          decedents dying after December 31, 1981, the current definition             
          applies.").                                                                 
               2.  Later Act Does Not Cover Whole Subject                             
               Moreover, it cannot be said that "the later act covers the             
          whole subject of the earlier one and is clearly intended as a               
          substitute".  It is clear that this was not a comprehensive                 
          revision of the estate tax treatment of joint interests, designed           
          to totally displace all prior enactments.  Rather, the 1981                 
          amendment merely changed the definition of "qualified joint                 
          interests" contained in section 2040(b)(2) without amending the             
          operational rule of section 2040(b)(1).  The 1981 amendment                 
          cannot stand by itself, as it merely redefines "qualified joint             
          interests" and is incomplete without the operative inclusion                
          rules provided in section 2040(a) and (b)(1).  Respondent would             
          have us repeal only the effective date of subsection (b)(1) while           




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011