KENCO Restaurants, Inc. et al. - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
               the arm's length charge shall be deemed equal to the                   
               costs or deductions incurred with respect to such                      
               services * * * unless the taxpayer establishes a more                  
               appropriate charge * * *                                               
               In pertinent part, section 1.482-2(b)(7)(ii)(A), Income Tax            
          Regs., provides:  "Services are an integral part of the business            
          activity of a member of a controlled group where the renderer               
          renders services to one or more related parties as one of its               
          principal activities."                                                      
               Section 1.482-1(a)(4), Income Tax Regs., provides:  "The               
          term 'controlled taxpayer' means any one of two or more                     
          organizations, trades, or businesses owned or controlled directly           
          or indirectly by the same interests."                                       
               B.  Burden of Proof                                                    
               Respondent’s authority to make allocations under section 482           
          is broad.  Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 525, 581-           
          582 (1989), affd. 933 F.2d 1084 (2d Cir. 1991); Edwards v.                  
          Commissioner, 67 T.C. 224, 230 (1976); PPG Indus., Inc. v.                  
          Commissioner, 55 T.C. 928, 990-991 (1970).  Respondent’s section            
          482 determination must be sustained absent a showing that he has            
          abused his discretion.  Paccar, Inc. v. Commissioner, 85 T.C.               
          754, 787 (1985), affd. 849 F.2d 393 (9th Cir. 1988).  The                   
          determination of whether respondent abused his discretion                   
          presents a question of fact, and petitioners bear the burden of             
          proof.  Rule 142(a).  Indeed, in order for us to redetermine a              
          deficiency attributable to section 482, petitioners bear the                
          heavier than normal burden of proving that respondent’s section             



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011