Michael London - Page 63

                                       - 63 -                                         
             explanations of her behavior are implausible or                          
             inconsistent.                                                            
                  We agree with respondent that several indicia of fraud              
             are present with respect to Mr. London.  In these cases,                 
             Mr. London failed to report income in the amounts of                     
             $311,974.34 for 1983 and $213,120.25 for 1985.  These                    
             understatements represented approximately a 20-percent                   
             omission of income for 1983 and a 45-percent omission for                
             1985.  Substantial understatements of income in successive               
             years, when coupled with other circumstances showing an                  
             intent to conceal or misstate income, justify an inference               
             of fraud.  Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. at 137-139;                
             Patton v. Commissioner, 799 F.2d 166, 171 (5th Cir. 1986),               
             affg. T.C. Memo. 1985-148.  Moreover, the fact that                      
             Mr. London engaged in illegal activities, and was con-                   
             victed of RICO offenses, money laundering, extortion, and                
             failure to file CTR's, is a badge of fraud.  Bradford v.                 
             Commissioner, supra at 307-308.  Mr. London has not shown                
             that he maintained adequate books and records for M.L.                   
             Associates, his check-cashing business.  Special Agent                   
             Rooks testified that he found no formal books and records                
             for M.L. Associates.  Mr. London's failure to maintain                   
             adequate records is indicative of fraud.  Truesdell v.                   








Page:  Previous  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011