- 2 - property under section 1031.1 More specifically, we must decide whether petitioner held the exchanged real property primarily for sale so that the gain is taxable in the 1989 taxable year. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein. Petitioner's principal office was located in San Bernardino, California, at the time it filed its petition. Petitioner filed a U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return, Form 1120, for the taxable year 1989, with the Director, Internal Revenue Service Center, Fresno, California. Petitioner used a fiscal year ending March 31. Petitioner was incorporated on September 18, 1957, under the laws of the State of California. From petitioner's inception to the taxable year 1991, Neal T. Baker (Mr. Baker), as president and director of petitioner,2 controlled and directed its operations. Additionally, starting in 1987, Mr. Baker was petitioner's chief financial officer. During the period from 1 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, unless otherwise indicated. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2 At times during the period 1978 to 1991, Neal T. Baker also served as treasurer and secretary of petitioner. Besides his role with petitioner, Mr. Baker was a charter member of the Business Bank of California. As a chairman of the bank's loan committee, Mr. Baker reviewed construction loans.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011