Mel T. Nelson - Page 38

                                       - 38 -                                         

               FOLEY, J., concurring in result only:  I agree with the                
          majority's holding.  Section 108(d)(7)(A) explicitly provides               
          that subsections (a), (b), (c), and (g) of section 108 are to be            
          applied at the corporate level.  I write separately to emphasize            
          that after the application of section 108(b) and the resulting              
          reduction of tax attributes (i.e., MAI's net operating loss)                
          there are no "items of income", tax-exempt or otherwise, to which           
          section 1366(a) may apply.  The legislative history accompanying            
          the Bankruptcy Tax Act of 1980 states that after a taxpayer                 
          reduces its tax attributes "Any further remaining debt discharge            
          amount is disregarded, i.e., does not result in income or have              
          other tax consequences."  S. Rept. 96-1035, at 2 (1980), 1980-2             
          C.B. 620, 621.  Thus, there are no "items of income", and, as a             
          result, no basis adjustment pursuant to section 1367.                       
          Accordingly, there is no need to distinguish between "tax-exempt"           
          and "deferred" income.                                                      

               SWIFT, PARR, WHALEN, and COLVIN, JJ., agree with this                  
          concurring in result only opinion.                                          















Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  

Last modified: May 25, 2011