Stephen D. Podd - Page 51

                                       - 51 -                                         
          Powertex may not deduct the payments to SCS in 1990 in the amount of        
          $219,289 as an ordinary and necessary business expense.13                   
          IV.  Issue 3:  Whether Amounts Deducted by Powertex as Management           
               Fees Paid to Powertex Plus International, Inc. Are Reasonable          
               Payments for Services Rendered                                         
                                    FINDINGS OF FACT                                  
               During the years 1977 through 1990, the Podds and Mrs. Podd            
          were Canadian citizens.  From 1977 through 1983, the Podds and Mrs.         
          Podd did not hold any immigration status or visa with the United            
          States.  During 1977, the Immigration and Naturalization Service            
          (INS) detained Mr. Podd while he was crossing the United                    
          States/Canadian border and questioned him about his immigration             
          status and right to work in the United States.                              
               On September 19, 1977, Powertex Plus International, Inc. (Plus)        
          was incorporated in Canada by Mr. Podd, originally under the name           
          Powerweb Corporation, Ltd.  Petitioners' law firm advised Mr. Podd          


          13   As we noted, the witness who could have offered the most               
          illuminating testimony concerning the services provided by SCS,             
          Mr. Clark, was not called to testify by either respondent or                
          petitioners.  Given the fact that Mr. Clark authorized Sea-Land             
          to give free freight to Powertex for the shipment of liners to              
          Powertex customers, the free freight arrangement was terminated             
          shortly after Mr. Clark retired from Sea-Land, and thereafter               
          Sea-Land filed suit to recover the payments from Powertex to SCS,           
          the most plausible explanation for the payments is that they were           
          kickbacks to Mr. Clark.  Petitioners have obvious reasons for not           
          contending that the payments were kickbacks, and respondent, as             
          noted, may have been reluctant to characterize the payments as              
          illegal kickbacks due to the burden of proof provision in sec.              
          162(c)(2).  In any event, we are left with a less than adequate             
          record concerning the SCS payments, and it is petitioners' burden           
          to prove that such payments were ordinary and necessary business            
          expenses.                                                                   




Page:  Previous  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011