Stephen D. Podd - Page 58

                                       - 58 -                                         
                                        OPINION                                       
               A dividend is a distribution of property by a corporation to           
          its shareholders out of its earnings and profits.  Sec. 316(a).             
          Dividends are taxable as ordinary income to shareholders to the             
          extent of the earnings and profits of the corporation.  Sec. 316.  A        
          dividend need not be formally declared or even intended by the              
          corporation.  Noble v. Commissioner, 368 F.2d 439, 442 (9th Cir.            
          1966), affg. T.C. Memo. 1965-84; Commissioner v. Makransky, 321 F.2d        
          598 (3d Cir. 1963), affg. 36 T.C. 446 (1961); Sachs v. Commissioner,        
          277 F.2d 879 (8th Cir. 1960), affg. 32 T.C. 815 (1959).                     
          Additionally, the distribution need not be made to a shareholder,           
          but only for the shareholder's personal benefit.  Cirelli v.                
          Commissioner, 82 T.C. 335, 351 (1984); Edgar v. Commissioner, 56            
          T.C. 717 (1971).  The determination of whether a constructive               
          dividend has occurred is a question of fact which depends on each           
          case.  Hardin v. United States, 461 F.2d 865 (5th Cir. 1972).               
               The only argument petitioners advance with respect to the              
          royalty payments is that the full amount of such payments is                
          deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense and                
          therefore cannot be a constructive dividend.  As discussed supra, we        
          have found that the appropriate royalty rate for the patents                
          licensed pursuant to the Tri-Podd license agreement is 9 percent.           
          To the extent that royalty payments were made in excess of 9                








Page:  Previous  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011