Rolf E. Polentarutti - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          petitioner's extensive use of funds to make personal investments            
          exceeded his authority.                                                     
               Petitioner offered into evidence a copy of a fax purportedly           
          from Aeberhard to petitioner dated 3 days before the trial in               
          this case.  We did not admit the fax into evidence because it was           
          hearsay, and it was not exchanged at least 15 days before the               
          first day of the trial session as required by our standing                  
          pretrial order.  Materials not provided in compliance with our              
          standing pretrial order may be excluded from evidence.  Rules               
          104(c)(2), 132(b); Moretti v. Commissioner, 77 F.3d 637, 644 (2d            
          Cir. 1996).                                                                 
               Even if we had admitted the Aeberhard fax, it would not have           
          convinced us that petitioner had authority to use $200,000 of the           
          investors' funds for personal purposes.  The fax states that it             
          responds to Elwood's letter sent about 4 years earlier, and that            
          Aeberhard gave petitioner permission to use his funds.                      
          Aeberhard's fax says that petitioner was supposed to pay office             
          expenses and overhead as his contribution to the projects in                
          return for a percentage of the profits.  The fax also says that             
          petitioner told Aeberhard that he sometimes took funds from the             
          projects to use for personal purposes, but that most of the time            
          he had other funds available for this, and that Aeberhard did not           
          object if petitioner repaid the funds and the projects did not              
          suffer.  The fax does not show that Aeberhard knew and approved             
          of petitioner's use of $200,000 for his own investments.                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011