- 11 - Petitioner made no argument that he is not liable for the accuracy-related penalty. We treat this as a concession by petitioner. Rothstein v. Commissioner, supra; Reaves v. Commissioner, supra. We conclude that petitioner is liable for the accuracy-related penalty for 1989 under section 6662(a) for negligence or intentional disregard of the rules or regulations and that all of the deficiency is due to negligence. To reflect concessions and the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: May 25, 2011