Estate of Robert W. Quick, Deceased, Esther P. Quick, Personal Representative, and Esther P. Quick - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               Our jurisdiction to determine overpayments of tax is                   
          provided by section 6512(b).  Judge v. Commissioner, supra at               
          1182.  Section 6512(b) provides:                                            
               (b) Overpayment Determined by Tax Court.--                             
                    (1) Jurisdiction to determine.--Except as provided                
               by paragraph (3) and by section 7463, if the Tax Court                 
               finds that there is no deficiency and further finds                    
               that the taxpayer has made an overpayment of income tax                
               for the same taxable year * * * in respect of which the                
               Secretary determined the deficiency, or finds that                     
               there is a deficiency but that the taxpayer has made an                
               overpayment of such tax, the Tax Court shall have                      
               jurisdiction to determine the amount of such                           
               overpayment, and such amount shall, when the decision                  
               of the Tax Court has become final, be credited or                      
               refunded to the taxpayer.                                              
          Section 6512(b)(2) confers jurisdiction to order refunds of                 
          overpayments determined by this Court "after 120 days after a               
          decision * * * has become final."                                           
               Respondent, by virtue of having challenged petitioners'                
          characterization of their distributive share of adjusted                    
          partnership losses for 1989 and 1990, has effectively transmuted            
          what otherwise would have been unquestionably a partnership item,           
          i.e., the amount of losses in petitioners' hands, into an                   
          affected item requiring partner level factual determinations.               
          Sec. 6231(a)(3); sec. 301.6231(a)(3)-1(a)(1)(i), Proced. & Admin.           
          Regs.  Having concluded that the section 469 issue is an affected           
          item subject to deficiency proceedings under section                        
          6230(a)(2)(A)(i), it follows that we have jurisdiction to                   
          determine any overpayments attributable thereto in this partner             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011