Raymond E. Roth - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         

          On August 22, 1997, respondent filed the instant motion for                 
          judgment on the pleadings.  After several unsuccessful informal             
          attempts to contact petitioner to arrange for a telephone                   
          conference to discuss the instant motion,3 the Court struck the             
          case from the October 27, 1997, St. Louis trial session and                 
          established a briefing schedule on the instant motion.                      
          Petitioner has not filed any brief or otherwise responded to the            
          instant motion.                                                             
               Our findings are based entirely on those matters that are              
          admitted or deemed admitted in the pleadings.                               
          Background--Facts                                                           
               When the petition was filed in the instant case, petitioner            
          resided in Belleville, Illinois.                                            
               During each of the years 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and             
          1994, petitioner was engaged in the business of publishing a                
          magazine entitled “Southern Illinois Prep Sports” (hereinafter              
          sometimes referred to as SIPS), featuring local high school                 
          athletes.  Petitioner conducted this business as a sole                     
          proprietorship doing business as “Southern Illinois Prep Sports”.           
          In each of the years 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994, petitioner           
          published two editions of SIPS: a football issue in the fall and            

               3    At some point after the notice of trial was served and            
          before respondent filed the instant motion for judgment on the              
          pleadings, petitioner apparently moved from the address listed in           
          the petition.  Petitioner has not communicated with the Court,              
          formally or informally, since then.                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011