Raymond E. Roth - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

               The issue of fraud poses a factual question that is to be              
          decided on an examination of all the evidence in the record.                
          Plunkett v. Commissioner, 465 F.2d at 303; Mensik v.                        
          Commissioner, 328 F.2d 147, 150 (7th Cir. 1964), affg. 37 T.C.              
          703 (1962); Stone v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. at 224.                          
               In order to establish fraud as to petitioner, respondent               
          must show that petitioner intended to evade taxes, which he knew            
          or believed were owed, by conduct intended to conceal, mislead,             
          or otherwise prevent the collection of taxes.  E.g., Webb v.                
          Commissioner, 394 F.2d 366, 377 (5th Cir. 1968), affg. T.C. Memo.           
          1966-81; Powell v. Granquist, 252 F.2d 56, 60 (9th Cir. 1958);              
          Danenberg v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 370, 393 (1979); McGee v.                
          Commissioner, 61 T.C. 249, 256-257 (1973), affd. 519 F.2d 1121              
          (5th Cir. 1975).  This intent may be inferred from circumstantial           
          evidence, Powell v. Granquist, 252 F.2d at 61; Gajewski v.                  
          Commissioner, 67 T.C. 181, 200 (1976), affd. without published              
          opinion 578 F.2d 1383 (8th Cir. 1978), including the                        
          implausibility of petitioner’s explanations, Bradford v.                    
          Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307 (9th Cir. 1986) (and cases                  
          therein cited), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601; Boyett v.                        
          Commissioner, 204 F.2d 205, 208 (5th Cir. 1953), affg. a                    
          Memorandum Opinion of this Court dated Mar. 14, 1951.                       
               Respondent has proven by clear and convincing evidence that            
          there was an underpayment of tax for each of the years in issue.            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011