Richard J. Salem and Eileen L. Salem - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         

               The Eleventh Circuit agreed that economic outlay is required           
          before stockholders in an S corporation may increase their basis,           
          and that "In most cases, a mere guarantee of a corporate loan is            
          insufficient, absent subrogation, to increase a taxpayer's                  
          basis."  Selfe v. United States, supra at 774.  The court noted,            
          however, that "a guarantor who has pledged stock to secure a loan           
          has experienced an economic outlay to the extent that that                  
          pledged stock is not available as collateral for other                      
          investments."  Id. at 772 n.7.                                              
               Relying upon the principles of Plantation Patterns, Inc. v.            
          Commissioner, 462 F.2d 712 (5th Cir. 1972), affg. T.C. Memo.                
          1970-182, the Eleventh Circuit held that "a shareholder guarantee           
          of a loan may be treated for tax purposes as an equity investment           
          in the corporation where the lender looks to the shareholder as             
          the primary obligor."  Selfe v. United States, supra at 774.  The           
          court concluded that "under the principles of Plantation                    
          Patterns, a shareholder who has guaranteed a loan to a Subchapter           
          S corporation may increase her basis where the facts demonstrate            
          that, in substance, the shareholder has borrowed funds and                  
          subsequently advanced them to her corporation."  Id. at 773.  In            
          Selfe, the specific issue before the court was whether any                  
          material facts were at issue making summary judgment                        
          inappropriate.  Finding that such issues existed, the court                 







Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011