Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               the transactions, Tracinda and MGM were part of a                      
               "Controlled Group" for the purposes of sec. 267,                       
               I.R.C., Tracinda claims the UA Loss is deferred and                    
               transferred to its basis in the UA shares, by virtue of                
               the operation of sec. 267(f), I.R.C., and sec.                         
               1.267(f)-1T(c), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 49 Fed.                    
               Reg. 46997 (Nov. 30, 1984).  (Sec. 267 issue.)                         
               Tracinda subsequently sold the UA shares to third                      
               parties.                                                               
                    R claims the benefit of the UA Loss should be                     
               denied to both parties because the form adopted by Ps                  
               does not reflect the substance of the transaction.  R                  
               seeks to have the UA transaction recharacterized into a                
               part sale, part redemption transaction.  If                            
               recharacterized as a redemption, R contends that sec.                  
               311(a), I.R.C., operates to deny the benefit of the UA                 
               Loss to both parties.  (Sec. 311 issue.)                               
                    R has denied Ps any tax benefit from the UA Loss.                 
               R has filed a motion for summary judgment on the sec.                  
               311 issue.  Both Ps have filed cross-motions for                       
               partial summary judgments on the secs. 311 and 267                     
               issues.  These cases have been consolidated to clarify                 
               the tax consequences of the transactions common to all                 
               the parties.                                                           
                    Held:  The form chosen by Ps was not a fiction                    
               that failed to reflect the substance of the                            
               transaction.  Esmark, Inc. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 171                
               (1988), affd. 886 F.2d 1318 (7th Cir. 1989), followed.                 
               Consequently, sec. 311, I.R.C., has no application to                  
               this transaction.                                                      
                    Held, further:  Where a corporation that is a                     
               member of a controlled group is acquired by an                         
               unrelated third party, thereby terminating the                         
               controlled group relationship, and that corporation                    
               simultaneously sells an asset at a loss to a member of                 
               the former controlled group, sec. 267(f), I.R.C., and                  
               sec. 1.267(f)-1T, Temporary Income Tax Regs., 49 Fed.                  
               Reg. 46997 (Nov. 30, 1984), do not defer or deny the                   
               loss of the selling member, or increase the purchasing                 
               member's basis in the asset by the amount of the loss.                 

               William F. Nelson and Suzanne Celeste Feese, for petitioner            
          in docket No. 13977-96.                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011