BTR Dunlop Holdings, Inc. - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         

               Petitioner challenged this valuation with an appraisal of              
          Schlegel UK prepared by Ernst & Young LLP (E&Y).  In preparing              
          its valuation report, E&Y used the management-prepared sales                
          projections for Schlegel UK, concluding that the value of                   
          Schlegel UK was $15 million on a “stand-alone” basis.  Rachwal,             
          however, rejected the E&Y "stand-alone" valuation theory in favor           
          of a "highest and best use" valuation.  Rachwal did, however,               
          revise his final valuation of Schlegel UK from $49,069,000 to               
          $48,838,000 after adjusting for corporate overhead expenses and             
          revising the applicable exchange rate.  The notice of deficiency            
          calculated gain based on the values determined by Rachwal of                
          $48,838,000 for Schlegel UK and $13,246,000 for Schlegel GmbH.              
                              ULTIMATE FINDINGS OF FACT                               
               On June 30, 1989, the fair market value of Schlegel UK was             
          $31 million.                                                                
               On November 30, 1989, the fair market value of Schlegel GmbH           
          was $3.777 million, exclusive of the silent partnership interest.           
                                       OPINION                                        
               Section 311(b) provides that, in the case of distributions             
          of appreciated property to a shareholder, a corporation                     
          recognizes gain to the extent that the fair market value of the             
          distributed property exceeds its adjusted basis in the hands of             
          the distributing corporation.  See Martin Ice Cream Co. v.                  
          Commissioner, 110 T.C. 189, 219-220 (1998).  In the alternative,            





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011