Central Reserve Life Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         

          Revenue Act of 1921 (1921 Act), ch. 136, sec. 247(a)(4), 42 Stat.           
          263, changed favorably to life insurance companies the law under            
          which life insurance companies were taxed by providing a system             
          under which life insurance companies were taxed only on their net           
          investment income.  Investment income, for this purpose, did not            
          include premiums, losses and expenses incurred in underwriting              
          operations, and gains and losses from the sale of investment                
          assets.  The portion of investment income set aside in reserves             
          to satisfy a company’s obligations to its policyholders under its           
          insurance contracts also was excluded from taxation.  See id.               
               Before the 1921 Act, the same statutory provisions applied             
          to tax both life and P&C insurers.  The 1921 Act changed this               
          uniformity by providing for life insurance companies rules which            
          were different and generally more favorable than the rules under            
          which a P&C insurer was taxed.  The 1921 Act taxed P&C insurers             
          on both their investment and premium income and did not allow               
          them to deduct their reserve funds.  P&C insurers, however, could           
          deduct their “losses incurred”, see 1921 Act sec. 247(a)(4), 42             
          Stat. 263, a deduction that required a calculation of the P&C               
          insurer's unpaid losses at the end of the year, see 1921 Act sec.           
          246(b)(6), 42 Stat. 227.  For the purpose of this calculation,              
          the unpaid losses of a P&C company included its accrued                     
          liabilities.  See Retailers Fire Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 3                







Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011