Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al - Page 16




                                       - 105 -                                        

          Year                   Deficiency       Additions to Tax                    
          1979           $3,606.40              ---                                   
               1980            6,175.76              ---                              
          The $3,606.40 figure for 1979 represents a 20-percent reduction             
          of the $4,508 deficiency that respondent determined against the             
          Cravenses for that year.  However, the derivation of the                    
          $6,175.76 figure for 1980 is not known; it exceeded the correct             
          deficiency of $5,893.45 for 1980, including adjustments                     
          eliminating both the capital gains that the Cravenses reported              
          for that year and respondent's alternative determination that the           
          Cravenses failed to report dividends paid to them by Candace.               
          The sum of the two figures ($9,782.16) is equal to the total tax            
          deficiency Messrs. Cravens and McWade had previously agreed                 
          to, as shown by Mr. Cravens' letter of December 16, 1986, to                
          Mr. McWade.                                                                 
               Mr. Sims approved Mr. McWade's decision to forward decision            
          documents to the Cravenses for their signature 1 month before               
          trial of the test cases, believing that the Cravenses had                   
          accepted the 20-percent settlement offer.  When Mr. Cravens                 
          testified at the trial of the test cases, Mr. Sims continued to             
          believe that Mr. Cravens was entitled to the 20-percent                     
          settlement.  On December 23, 1988, the Cravenses signed the                 
          decision documents and returned them to Mr. McWade.                         
               When Mr. Cravens appeared at the trial of the test cases, he           
          was surprised and suspicious when Mr. McWade informed him that he           




Page:  Previous  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011