- 37 - and 1983 for the first time in its history. Petitioner's management attributed the company's poor performance to the end of the energy crisis and resulting glut of oil, worldwide over-production of grains, high interest rates, and the Federal Government's implementation of the payment- in-kind program, which caused a general decrease in the production of many agricultural commodities. Petitioner's members were also adversely affected by a general recession in the agricultural sector of the economy during this period. Petitioner's consolidated financial data regarding the company's farm supply operations for the period from 1980 to 1983 are as follows: 1980 1981 1982 1983 Gross farm supply revenue $2,725 $3,040 $2,775 $2,546 Farm supply operating 273 187 90 2 savings Total net savings1 202 68 (32) (138) Interest expense 92 105 122 106 Funded long-term debt 584 684 795 566 Fixed assets before 1,410 1,655 1,787 1,149 depreciation 1Total net savings before income taxes, patronage refunds, and extraordinary items. During the period from 1981 to 1983, petitioner's operating and capital needs were met primarily through a combination of bank financing on a floating-rate basis, issuance of medium- and long-term subordinated debt, and retained earnings, including patronage dividends not paid in cash. During this period, petitioner's loans from thePage: Previous 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011